Luxembourg: The Grand Duchy’s Two Realities

An analysis of Europe’s wealthiest nation and its critical housing paradox.

 

~€115,000

Highest GDP per Capita

Consistently ranked as the wealthiest country in the world by this metric.

~18.5x

Highest Price-to-Income Ratio

One of the most unaffordable housing markets in the world relative to local salaries.

The Engine of Wealth

Luxembourg’s economy is a powerhouse, offering average salaries that significantly outpace its neighbors. This economic pull is the primary driver of its unique workforce dynamic.

Key Takeaway: The substantial salary gap is the primary magnet attracting a vast cross-border workforce, despite the high cost of living.

The Housing Crisis

However, this wealth comes at a cost. The housing market is notoriously inaccessible, not just for the average worker but even for high-earning professionals. The property price-to-income ratio illustrates this starkly.

Key Takeaway: It is significantly more expensive to buy a home relative to income in Luxembourg than in other major European hubs, forcing many to live abroad.

The Result: A “Commuter Nation”

Workforce Composition

Nearly half of Luxembourg’s workforce does not live in the country. They commute daily, creating a unique economic dynamic and notorious daily traffic.

Key Takeaway: The economy is fundamentally dependent on “frontaliers” (cross-border commuters) to function.

Origin of Commuters

These commuters arrive daily from neighboring France, Belgium, and Germany, drawn by high salaries they can’t access at home.

Key Takeaway: France contributes the largest portion of the cross-border workforce, highlighting the deep economic integration with its neighbors.

The Social & Cultural Side-Effects

The Trilingual Reality

Officially trilingual, navigating the social and professional landscape can be complex. While French is common in business, Luxembourgish is vital for social integration and citizenship, and German is also widely used.

Luxembourgish (National)
French (Administrative)
German (Traditional)

This high barrier, combined with a transient expat population, can lead to feelings of social isolation for new arrivals.

The “Boring” Paradox

Despite immense wealth, a common complaint, especially from young professionals comparing it to other European capitals, is the quiet lifestyle. This is often attributed to:

• Small size and population (approx. 660,000)
• Early closing times for shops and restaurants
• A focus on family-oriented, quiet living
• A stark contrast to nearby capitals like Paris or Berlin

The Grand Duchy’s Central Question

Is the high salary and excellent quality of life worth the astronomical cost of housing and the perpetual feeling of being a commuter in a hyper-rich bubble? This remains the core debate for the thousands who cross its borders every day.

 

 

I. Defining the Luxembourg Paradox: A Global Economic Anomaly

 

Luxembourg presents a unique case study in global finance and domestic policy, standing as the world’s richest country by several key metrics while simultaneously grappling with one of the most structurally dysfunctional housing markets in the developed world. This paradox is not a simple contradiction but a direct consequence of an internationalized economic model that prioritizes capital attraction over domestic resource allocation.

 

1.1. Wealth Quantification: GDP, PPP, and the Median Wealth Advantage

 

The starting point for analyzing the Luxembourg Paradox is the undeniable scale and depth of its national wealth. The Grand Duchy’s economic stature is consistently top-ranked globally, driven primarily by its stability and role as a sophisticated financial hub.1

Macroeconomic indicators confirm unparalleled per capita prosperity. IMF projections place the GDP per capita (current prices) at approximately $146.82 thousand and $152.39 thousand when adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2025.2 These figures significantly exceed the averages for both the world ($14.61 thousand) and advanced economies ($61.97 thousand), establishing Luxembourg at the global zenith of economic productivity.3

Crucially, this wealth is not solely an artifact of high finance masking widespread inequality. Luxembourg leads the world in median wealth per adult, measured at an estimated $395,000 based on 2024 data.4 This measure of central tendency provides a more accurate picture of broad household affluence than average wealth, where Luxembourg ranks fourth globally at $566,735 per adult.5 This leading median figure places the Grand Duchy far ahead of other wealthy nations such as Switzerland ($222K median) and the United States ($124K median).4

This pervasive affluence provides a powerful, self-sustaining demand floor in the domestic property market. The economy relies on attracting high-wage earners (the median hourly wage is the second highest in the European Union 6), and these substantial domestic and international salaries provide immense purchasing power. The economic model itself generates the intense, persistent demand that perpetually strains the limited domestic supply system.

Table 1: Comparison of Luxembourg’s Economic Standing (2025 Estimates)

 

Metric	Value (USD/capita)	Global/European Rank	Source
GDP per capita (PPP)	$152.39 thousand	Highest globally	[2]
Median Wealth per Adult (2024)	~$395,000	1st globally	4
Average Wealth per Adult (2025)	$566,735	4th globally	5

 

1.2. The Housing Counterpoint: Benchmarking Unaffordability

 

The direct consequence of this concentrated demand on finite domestic resources is the extreme unaffordability of housing, which has deteriorated rapidly over the last decade.

The rate of real estate price escalation in Luxembourg has been exceptional, far outpacing regional neighbors. Between 2010 and 2021, property prices surged by 135%, compared with an average increase of approximately 42% across the euro area.7 This aggressive growth trajectory is indicative of intense speculative pressure and a persistent supply imbalance. Furthermore, the Home Price-to-Income Ratio increased by 20% between 2015 and 2024, signaling a rapid erosion of affordability for typical wage earners, placing the country alongside other highly strained markets globally.8

The rental market reflects similar distress. Reports indicate that rents skyrocketed between 50% and 100% from 2013 to 2023, mirroring affordability crises seen in major European metropolises like Dublin and Berlin.9

 

1.3. Economic Stability vs. Social Fragility: The Paradox as a Systemic Risk

 

The tension between extreme wealth and domestic housing scarcity creates a systemic threat to Luxembourg’s economic stability. The policy failure to supply sufficient housing undermines the long-term prerequisites necessary for maintaining the highly successful, globally competitive financial model.

The acute housing crisis is transforming into a critical operational risk for the national economy. High housing costs make it increasingly challenging for businesses to attract essential young talent and specialized workers outside of the highest-paid financial sectors.7 This pressure threatens future economic growth by damaging the talent pipeline. The persistence of this imbalance suggests that historically, governance structures implicitly prioritized external factors, such as maximizing financial sector competitiveness, over fundamental domestic needs like providing affordable homes. This creates a deep-seated social fragility that threatens the social contract and cohesion within the Grand Duchy.9

 

II. The Acute Housing Crisis: Metrics of Social and Economic Strain

 

The structural deficit in housing supply translates directly into severe financial stress for residents, transforming the country’s affluence into a lived experience of financial hardship for many households.

 

2.1. The Burden on Households: Rental and Ownership Affordability Ratios

 

Despite high average incomes, a significant portion of the population faces severe housing cost burdens, highlighting that the high salaries mask a severe erosion of net purchasing power.

Private tenants face an exorbitant cost burden, dedicating an average of 39% of their disposable income (including charges) to housing costs in 2023.10 This ratio represents the most significant increase among Luxembourg’s neighbors, climbing sharply from 32% between 2016 and 2023, reflecting a lack of effective rental market regulation when compared to systems in Germany or France.11

The impact of high prices is particularly acute among vulnerable households. The lowest 20% of households are burdened by housing costs exceeding half of their disposable income (>50%), while single-parent families face a 50% burden.11 The shortage of social housing, which accounts for only approximately 2% of the total housing stock—one of the lowest shares in Europe 7—forces low- and middle-income residents directly into the high-demand, high-speculation private market. This market mechanism drives up the national average rental burden, confirming that limited public provision is a direct structural driver of social inequality and stress, placing these groups at a high risk of poverty and social exclusion.11

Furthermore, the high property prices have directly impacted the fundamental goal of homeownership. The national homeownership rate has noticeably declined in recent years, falling sharply to 63.5% in 2024 from 72.4% just two years prior.14 This signifies a forced shift of residents out of the ownership track and into the high-cost, high-friction rental sector, further straining that market segment.

Table 2: Indicators of Luxembourg’s Housing Affordability Crisis

 

Metric	Luxembourg Value	Trend (2015-2024)	Structural Implication
Rental Cost Burden (Private Tenant Income Share)	39% (2023)	Increased sharply (2016-2023)	Limited rental market regulation vs. neighbors 11
Rental Cost Burden (Lowest 20% Income Share)	>50% (2023)	Acute vulnerability	Threatens social justice and access to decent living [11, 13]
Home Price-to-Income Ratio Change	+20% (2015-2024)	High growth	Rapid erosion of ownership accessibility 8
Homeownership Rate	63.5% (2024)	Sharp decline	Shift towards a strained, high-cost rental sector 14

 

2.2. Market Dynamics: Price Correction and Stabilization in 2024-2025

 

The recent period of global monetary tightening and higher borrowing costs led to a temporary, but sharp, correction in the previously soaring housing market, confirming its sensitivity to macro-financial conditions. This tightening abruptly halted the decade-long housing boom, causing construction activity to fall by 40% and transaction volumes to drop by about 50% between 2022 and 2023.1 Prices for existing houses decreased by 9.9% year-over-year in Q2 2024.15

Despite this downturn, the market quickly showed signs of resilience and renewed confidence. By the fourth quarter of 2024, price declines had stabilized, and prices for existing houses rose by 3.0% and apartments by 1.8% compared to the previous year.15 Mortgage applications surged by 33% in Q2 2025, signaling a rapid rebound in buyer confidence driven by expectations of long-term capital appreciation.16

A critical consequence of the temporary correction was the profound collapse in the supply pipeline. Residential building permits plummeted, declining 8.6% year-on-year in 2024, following steep drops in the preceding two years.1 This period of reduced construction guarantees that the pre-existing structural supply shortage will be dramatically exacerbated, setting the stage for potentially explosive price growth once lending conditions ease further. The low gross rental yields (ranging from 2.6% to 3.5% nationally) 14 combined with the aggressive long-term price appreciation confirm that real estate is predominantly viewed by investors as a vehicle for speculative capital gains rather than recurring rental income.

 

III. Structural Failure: Diagnosing the Land and Planning Crisis

 

The inability of a nation defined by exceptional stability and wealth to house its workforce points to a deep-seated structural failure rooted in the governance of land use and property taxation.

 

3.1. Supply Constraints and Capacity Rigidities

 

While demand is intense and continuous, the supply side is fundamentally rigid. The increase in new construction has failed to keep pace with demand primarily due to capacity constraints, bureaucratic hurdles, productivity issues within the local construction sector, and complex administrative requirements.17 Significantly, the primary issue is not the physical scarcity of land within the Grand Duchy, but rather the failure to mobilize existing land that has already been zoned as buildable.7

 

3.2. Land Concentration and Speculation: The Political Economy of Hoarding

 

The central obstacle to increasing housing supply is the concentrated ownership of residential land, which facilitates speculative practices. Research shows that a tiny fraction of the population, specifically only 0.5% of the population, holds half of the country’s building land.7

This extreme concentration enables landowners and developers to engage in strategies such as land hoarding and land banking, deliberately withholding buildable plots from the market to maximize future price increases. This practice was historically enabled by a planning regime that was characterized as “negotiated” and “facilitative,” offering minimal proactive management or punitive measures against speculation.18

This speculative environment was fiscally subsidized for decades by the nation’s antiquated land tax. The current Land Tax (IFON) dates back to the 1930s, and crucially, the unit values used for its calculation date all the way back to 1941.19 This near-zero effective taxation ensured that holding undeveloped land was financially risk-free and immensely lucrative, as speculative capital gains far exceeded any minimal tax liability. The prolonged existence of this lax fiscal and planning framework indicates a political economy that has historically benefited concentrated property interests, leading to systemic wealth accumulation via real estate at the expense of general housing welfare and intergenerational equity.7

 

IV. The “Commuter Nation” Model and Mobility Consequences

 

The failure to provide affordable housing domestically is structurally offset by the massive reliance on cross-border labor, creating the operational structure known as the “Commuter Nation.”

 

4.1. Labor Market Dependency: The Scale of the Frontalier Workforce

 

Luxembourg’s economic engine is fundamentally dependent on workers from the Greater Region (France, Germany, and Belgium), effectively functioning as a cross-border labor market.21 Of the approximately 489,000 employees in 2024, 47% are cross-border workers (“frontaliers”) commuting across the border daily.6

This reliance means that over 74% of the total labor force is sourced from foreign workers, either residing inside or outside the country, with only one in four employees holding Luxembourg nationality.6 These massive commuting flows are an economic necessity, ensuring that the financial sector, ICT, and specialized industries can access the high-skilled labor required, a workforce that often cannot afford to live locally despite high salaries.21

Table 3: The Commuter Nation Demographic (2024)

 

Metric	Value	Source
Total Employees	489,000	6
Share of Cross-Border Workers (“Frontaliers”)	47%	[6, 23]
Total Foreign Workforce Share (Resident + Cross-Border)	>74%	21

 

4.2. Traffic, Congestion, and Environmental Externalities

 

The daily influx of nearly half the working population, most often by private vehicle, results in severe and chronic road congestion. Luxembourg has consistently ranked in the world’s top 10 for road congestion, with the intensity of traffic concentrated heavily in Luxembourg City and its neighboring municipalities.24 This persistent use of private vehicles contributes to significant environmental externalities, with mobility still accounting for 26% of the Grand Duchy’s CO2 emissions.25

 

4.3. Evaluating Zero-Fare Transit as a Mitigating Factor

 

In March 2020, Luxembourg became the first country in the world to implement free public transport (FPT) nationwide, a major mobility experiment intended to mitigate the externalities of the commuter model.

The FPT policy has demonstrated environmental success, with estimates indicating an average reduction of approximately 8% in road transport CO2 emissions.25 The initiative is valued by users for the spontaneity of use and enhanced service, and it was designed to benefit commuters from neighboring countries by lowering cross-border fares.26

However, FPT has not served as a fundamental solution to the chronic traffic congestion or significantly reduced peak-hour car travel.26 The primary driver for cross-border commuting is the vast financial imperative created by the housing cost disparity, not the marginal cost of a public transport ticket (which was already inexpensive at €50 per month).27 Thus, while FPT functions effectively as an environmental and social measure, its impact on the infrastructural crisis caused by the housing supply failure is limited to being a palliative measure.

 

V. Policy Responses and the Path to Mobilization

 

Recognizing that the housing crisis poses a direct threat to the national economic model by inhibiting talent attraction, the government has begun implementing a comprehensive suite of structural reforms aimed at stimulating supply and punishing speculative behavior.

 

5.1. The Paradigm Shift: Pacte Logement 2.0 (Housing Pact 2.0)

 

The Pacte Logement 2.0 represents an institutional effort to re-engineer incentives at the local level. It establishes a partnership between the central government and communes to promote the creation of sustainable, affordable housing.28 The policy financially rewards municipalities for actively developing and implementing a Local Housing Action Programme (PAL).29

A key objective of this reform is to overcome the scarcity of public land. The program mandates that in future development plans (Plans d’Aménagement Particuliers, PAP), between 10% and 20% of the land must be transferred into public ownership and reserved exclusively for affordable housing provision.31 This is intended to act as a “paradigm shift” by ensuring that the state and communes finally control sufficient land to enable genuine public housing projects.31

 

5.2. Taxation as a Mobilization Tool: IFON, IMOB, and INOL

 

The most profound structural correction involves reforming the antiquated fiscal regime that enabled decades of land hoarding. The comprehensive legislative package includes the reform of the Land Tax (IFON), alongside the introduction of two new taxes specifically designed to activate dormant land and vacant properties.19

The IFON reform replaces the historically arbitrary valuation base dating back to 1941 with a new, objective, transparent, and fair evaluation model.19 The IMOB (Land Mobilization Tax) is a new measure designed to incentivize construction by penalizing owners who withhold buildable land from the market, thereby providing a clear financial disincentive to hoarding.19 Furthermore, the INOL (Tax on Non-Occupation of Housing) establishes a uniform national tax targeting vacant dwellings, aiming to force existing, underutilized housing stock onto the rental market.19

The introduction of these punitive taxes on land and vacant property, alongside the decision to finally reform the 1941-based land tax, indicates that the escalating social and economic costs of the housing crisis have finally superseded the political influence of entrenched land-owning interests.20 This structural policy change is necessary to break the cycle of land speculation. The effectiveness of this package, however, hinges entirely on the rigor of implementation: if the new tax rates are set too low, the financial incentive for speculative hoarding will continue to outweigh the tax cost, potentially rendering the reform ineffective.19 The legislation also includes a reduction or allowance for owners residing in their main residence, ensuring the burden falls primarily on speculative and underutilized assets, balancing social needs with fiscal objectives.19

 

5.3. Public-Private Partnerships and the Future of Social Supply

 

To enhance affordable housing provision beyond taxation, a new housing law was adopted in 2023 to strengthen affordability and improve the financing of social housing management, establishing a legal basis for ‘social landlords’.33

A 2024 pilot program aims to rapidly increase the supply of affordable rental housing through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs).33 Under this scheme, private developers build units on their land and lease them to public providers for a period of 20 years. The public providers then sub-let these units to eligible households at affordable rents. The housing ministry covers the difference between the rent paid to the landlord (up to 80% of market rent) and the affordable rent charged to the tenants.33 These efforts are designed to compensate for the current severe deficit in social housing provision.

 

VI. Socio-Cultural Consequences and the Expat Experience

 

The analysis of Luxembourg’s dichotomy must extend beyond economics to address the psychological and social environment, particularly concerning the experience of expats and younger generations.

 

6.1. Quality of Life Reconciled: High Safety and Infrastructure

 

On standard international measures, Luxembourg maintains a high ranking in quality of life indices (16th to 17th in Mercer’s 2023/2024 surveys).34 This ranking is largely attributed to the country’s robust stability, high level of public safety, solid infrastructure, and excellent connectivity. However, this high functional quality of the state clashes directly with the prohibitive cost of living, which still ranks 47th globally.34 The excellent public services and security benefits enjoyed by residents often fail to compensate for the daily financial stress imposed by the extreme cost of the housing market.

 

6.2. Multilingualism, Integration, and the Commuter Divide

 

Luxembourg’s institutional trilingualism (Luxembourgish, French, German) 36 creates a unique yet challenging social environment. While the high percentage of foreigners (47.4% of residents are non-nationals 21) ensures multiculturalism, genuine social integration often requires demonstrating an effort to learn one of the local languages, particularly outside the primary business contexts where English is proficient.36

The high turnover rate inherent in the large expat workforce, coupled with the linguistic complexity, contributes to difficulties in integration and social challenges. Many expats experience a feeling of isolation or struggle to establish deep, lasting social networks.37

 

6.3. The “Boring Paradox”: An Assessment of Cultural Infrastructure vs. Financial Density

 

The frequent sentiment that Luxembourg is “boring,” particularly among younger expats comparing it to vibrant global metropolises like Paris or London, reflects a socio-structural reality.38

The “Boring Paradox” is best understood as a consequence of structural social detachment. When nearly half the workforce commutes out daily, limiting evening and weekend resident populations 6, and resident integration is fragmented by high turnover and linguistic complexity, the necessary continuous energy and critical mass required to foster a vibrant, globally competitive cultural and social scene cannot fully coalesce. Furthermore, the economic success has inadvertently created massive intergenerational stress, delaying critical life milestones such as leaving the parental home and starting a family for younger generations who are frustrated by the financial impossibility of acquiring housing.7 This overall sense of disproportionate sacrifice among resident expats and young Luxembourgers—who pay the immense housing costs but struggle to find deep community—exacerbates the perception of limited cultural return on investment.

 

VII. Conclusion: Sustaining the Model in the Face of Domestic Fracture

 

The Luxembourg Paradox—structural wealth coupled with acute domestic housing failure—is a fundamental conflict between a highly successful, globalized financial economic model and a historically inertial domestic land management and fiscal policy framework. The immense, constant demand for housing, generated by the global attractiveness and wealth of the Grand Duchy, consistently overwhelmed a supply system held captive by concentrated land ownership and fiscally supported speculation.18

For the critical mass of high-skilled cross-border workers, the high salary and excellent functional quality of life is currently deemed worth the significant time and stress of commuting, provided the wage premium reliably offsets this personal cost [User Query]. This economic calculation sustains the “Commuter Nation” model, albeit with risks related to external infrastructure dependence.

However, the persistent failure to house its own residents poses an active threat to the long-term socio-economic stability of the nation. The crisis reached a critical inflection point where the cost to intergenerational equity and the ability to attract young talent demanded decisive political intervention.7

The policy measures introduced—specifically the introduction of the Land Mobilization Tax (IMOB) and the Tax on Non-Occupation (INOL), alongside the Pacte Logement 2.0—represent a genuine political commitment to structural correction aimed at finally overcoming decades of institutionalized land hoarding.19 The Grand Duchy’s ability to sustain its economic leadership and mitigate its domestic social fracture hinges entirely on the rigorous implementation and efficacy of these new tax and planning mechanisms to force land mobilization and expand public housing provision. If implementation is decisive, the paradox may begin to be mitigated; if it falters, the compounding supply deficit will continue to erode competitiveness and intensify intergenerational inequality.

Works cited

1. Promoting a strong and sustainable recovery: OECD Economic Surveys: Luxembourg 2025, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/04/oecd-economic-surveys-luxembourg-2025_3eb782b5/full-report/promoting-a-strong-and-sustainable-recovery_6093f5f5.html
2. Luxembourg – IMF DataMapper, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/LUX
3. World Economic Outlook (October 2025) – GDP per capita, current prices, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD/LUX
4. Top Countries by Average and Median Wealth per Person – Voronoi, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.voronoiapp.com/money/Top-Countries-by-Average-and-Median-Wealth-per-Person–6303
5. Ranked: Countries With the Highest Wealth per Person in 2025 – Visual Capitalist, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wealth-per-person-by-country-2025/
6. Regards 01/25 – Panorama of the Luxembourg labour market on May 1st – Statistiques.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://statistiques.public.lu/en/publications/series/regards/2025/regards-01-25.html
7. Luxembourg’s Housing Situation: A Double Crisis or the New Normal?, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.goldbridge.lu/blog/article-financial-analysis-housing-crisis
8. Home Affordability is Eroding in OECD Nations – Voronoi, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.voronoiapp.com/real-estate/Portugal-Has-Some-of-the-OECDs-Most-Unaffordable-Housing–4008
9. Why does Europe have a housing crisis and how do we fix it? – European Investment Bank, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.eib.org/en/essays/housing-crisis-solutions-europe
10. Private Tenants in Luxembourg Spend 39% of Income on Housing, New Report Finds, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.chronicle.lu/category/surveys-reports/57686-private-tenants-in-luxembourg-spend-39-of-income-on-housing-new-report-finds
11. Note 43: Real Estate Markets in Luxembourg’s Functional Urban Area, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.liser.lu/news/note-44
12. Unequal wealth: Exploring socioeconomic disparities across the EU – Eurofound, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/all/unequal-wealth-exploring-socioeconomic-disparities-across-eu
13. Poverty and social exclusion among young people – Luxembourg Report – Caritas Europa, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.caritas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20171109-PU-Caritas-cares-youth-poverty-country-report-luxembourg.pdf
14. Luxembourg Residential Real Estate Market Analysis 2025 – Global Property Guide, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/europe/luxembourg/price-history
15. Real Estate in Luxembourg: Trends and Developments – Norton Rose Fulbright, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/9fc2c88a/real-estate-in-luxembourg-trends-and-developments
16. Is Luxembourg property bubble bursting soon? (Sept 2025) – Investropa, accessed November 5, 2025, https://investropa.com/blogs/news/luxembourg-property-bubble-bursting
17. Luxembourg: Selected Issues in: IMF Staff Country Reports Volume 2022 Issue 153 (2022), accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2022/153/article-A001-en.xml
18. Full article: Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02673037.2021.1950647
19. Land tax and the mobilisation of land and housing – Ministère des Finances, accessed November 5, 2025, https://mfin.gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv2024_maint+en+dossiers+2022+impot-foncier.html
20. “Increasing the supply of housing!”: Reform of the land tax and the mobilisation of land and housing – The Luxembourg Government – Gouvernement.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://gouvernement.lu/en/actualites/toutes_actualites/communiques/2022/10-octobre/07-reforme-logement.html
21. Luxembourg – Re-thinking approaches to labour migration Potential and Gaps in EU Member States’ Migration Infrastructures Case Study Summar, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.migrationpartnershipfacility.eu/knowledge/resources/47-mapping/255-mapping-legal-pathways-luxembourg-summary-2024/preview?tmpl=component&ml=1
22. Regards 07/24 – Panorama of the Luxembourg labour market on May 1st – Statistiques.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://statistiques.public.lu/en/publications/series/regards/2024/regards-07-24.html
23. Luxembourg has the highest proportion of foreign-born residents in Europe, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.researchluxembourg.org/en/luxembourg-has-the-highest-proportion-of-foreign-born-residents-in-europe/
24. Border effects on the travel mode choice of resident and cross- border workers in Luxembourg – ResearchGate, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282503298_Border_effects_on_the_travel_mode_choice_of_resident_and_cross-_border_workers_in_Luxembourg
25. Mobility for cross-border workers – Luxembourg.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://luxembourg.public.lu/en/living/mobility/transports-publics-transfrontaliers.html
26. Zero fare, cleaner air? The causal effect of Luxembourg’s free public transportation policy on carbon emissions – Tobias Eibinger, accessed November 5, 2025, https://eibinget.github.io/files/zerofare.pdf
27. Lessons learnt from Luxembourg’s fare-free transport system – Global Railway Review, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/article/179222/lessons-learnt-from-luxembourgs-fare-free-transport-system/
28. The goals of the Pacte Logement – Niederanven, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.niederanven.lu/en/urban-planning/pacte-logement/the-goals-of-the-pacte-logement
29. Housing Pact 2.0 – Commune de Kopstal, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.kopstal.lu/en/commune/commitments-commune/housing-pact-20
30. accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.goldbridge.lu/blog/article-financial-analysis-housing-crisis#:~:text=The%20most%20emblematic%20modification%20is,construction%20is%20also%20expanding%20quickly.
31. State of the Nation 2021 – The Luxembourg Government – Gouvernement.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://gouvernement.lu/en/gouvernement/xavier-bettel/agenda.gouvernement2024%2Ben%2Bactualites%2Btoutes_actualites%2Bdiscours%2B2021%2B10-octobre%2B12-etat-de-la-nation.html
32. Amendments to Draft Law on Property Tax and Tax on Land Mobilisation Submitted to Parliament | ATOZ Tax Advisers Luxembourg, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.atoz.lu/media/amendments-draft-law-property-tax-and-tax-land-mobilisation-submitted-parliament
33. Luxembourg | Housing Europe, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.housingeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/luxembourg_the_state_of_housing_in_the_eu_2025_digital.pdf
34. Mercer 2024 Cost of Living Survey – Luxembourg.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://luxembourg.public.lu/en/living/quality-of-life/mercer-cost-of-living-survey-2024.html
35. QUALITY OF LIFE – BENCHMARKS | LMIH – Luxembourg – Let’s Make It Happen, accessed November 5, 2025, https://lmih.lu/en/outils/arguments/quality-of-life/
36. Cultural Do’s and Don’ts for Expats Living in Luxembourg – Talkpal, accessed November 5, 2025, https://talkpal.ai/cultural-dos-and-donts-for-expats-living-in-luxembourg/
37. LUXEMBOURG — A UNIQUE MULTILINGUAL PLACE IN THE WORLD, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.jeunes-au-luxembourg.lu/wp-content/unilu-content/pdf/Gotling-Dudding_N_Moser_S_2012_Luxembourg_A%20unique%20multilingual%20place%20in%20the%20world.pdf
38. No one should be allowed to say Luxembourg is boring unless they’ve spent at least 10 years being bored here, accessed November 5, 2025, https://wurst.lu/no-one-should-be-allowed-to-say-luxembourg-is-boring-unless-theyve-spent-at-least-10-years-being-bored-here/
39. Expensive housing in Luxembourg: a social explosive – Science.lu, accessed November 5, 2025, https://www.science.lu/fr/housing-policy/expensive-housing-luxembourg-social-explosive